[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug
From: |
Daniel Glöckner |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:26:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:46:08AM +0100, Christian Jullien wrote:
> I'm still looking in ISO standard if there is a note on this conversion.
> Anyway, tcc behaves differently from gcc (and *all* other compiler I know
> where is conversion truncates) while tcc rounds
it's specified in 6.3.1.4(1) in the N1124 draft.
Try again with current mob.
Daniel
- [Tinycc-devel] Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug, Christian Jullien, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug, Daniel Glöckner, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug, Christian Jullien, 2013/02/04
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug, Christian Jullien, 2013/02/04
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug,
Daniel Glöckner <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/04
- [Tinycc-devel] RE :Re: Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug, Christian JULLIEN, 2013/02/04
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] RE :Re: Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug, Daniel Glöckner, 2013/02/04
- [Tinycc-devel] RE :Re: RE :Re: Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug, Christian JULLIEN, 2013/02/04
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] RE :Re: RE :Re: Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug, Daniel Glöckner, 2013/02/04
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] RE :Re: Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/05
- [Tinycc-devel] RE :Re: RE :Re: Another ARM (RPi) compiler bug, Christian JULLIEN, 2013/02/05