[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?
From: |
Thomas Preud'homme |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement? |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:46:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Le samedi 16 février 2013 21:17:32, Michael Matz a écrit :
> __STDC_HOSTED__ : not set (incorrectly, it should probably be set to 1
> given that tcc assumes a normal main() and that the
> rest of the provided facilities is provided by the C
> library not under tcc control)
So what do you think of the attached patch?
Best regards,
Thomas
0001-Define-__STDC_HOSTED__.patch
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?, Christian Jullien, 2013/02/16
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?, Michael Matz, 2013/02/16
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?, Christian Jullien, 2013/02/16
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?, Michael Matz, 2013/02/16
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?, Christian Jullien, 2013/02/16
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?,
Thomas Preud'homme <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?, Michael Matz, 2013/02/17
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?, Christian Jullien, 2013/02/17
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/17
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] What C version tcc is supposed to implement?, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/02/27