[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Stack Overflow question about jmp
From: |
Thomas Preud'homme |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Stack Overflow question about jmp |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Sep 2013 20:07:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.10-3-amd64; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) |
Le dimanche 22 septembre 2013 19:55:11 Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
> Le dimanche 22 septembre 2013 18:16:06 grischka a écrit :
>
> > Beyond that
> >
> > error: unknown opcode 'jmp'
> >
> > is just a rather bad message. Maybe it could say something like
> >
> > error: bad operand '%eax' with opcode 'jmp'
>
> A test could be added with a TOK_ASM_allfirst and TOK_ASM_alllast to
> distinguish between incorrect operand and incorrect opcode.
Would a patch like the one attach be ok? I didn't named the operand because
when several alternatives exist for an opcode it's difficult to know which
operand is at fault (which of the alternative didn't match but was intended
to?).
Best regards,
Thomas
fix_error_msg_bad_operand.diff
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.