tinycc-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Running 'make test' on windows?


From: Austin English
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Running 'make test' on windows?
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:22:54 -0600

Of course! I did not mean any complaint, I was simply saying that I tested a release version since I suspected it would be stable and not likely to be broken from a recent regression  like trunk might be.

I'll be sure to test when it comes around :).

Thanks for all your hard work!


On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Preud'homme <address@hidden> wrote:
Le mercredi 22 janvier 2014, 04:18:53 Austin English a écrit :
> With commit 32a4962593d6a2006cdd725480124717e7f5377d, it builds and make
> test runs. There is an error:
> gcc -o tcctest.gcc tcctest.c -I.. -I..  -w -Wall -g -O2
> -fno-strict-aliasing -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-unused-result
> -DTCC_TARGET_I386 -DTCC_TARGET_PE -std=gnu99 -O0 -fno-omit-frame-pointer
> tcctest.c:6:15: error: operator '>=' has no left operand
>  #if GCC_MAJOR >= 3
>                ^
> tcctest.c: In function 'builtin_test':
> tcctest.c:2467:15: error: operator '>=' has no left operand
>  return (to);
>                ^
> make[1]: *** [test.ref] Error 1
>
> make -k otherwise looks good, thanks.
>
> P.S. I had actually originally tested against 0.9.26, not HEAD. I assumed a
> release had a better chance of reliably passing 'make test'. Maybe a goal
> for 0.9.27? ;)

I definitely hope that 0.9.27 will work better and more tests will pass. We all
worked hard for this. I myself focused on ARM as it's what I know best but
others have worked on it as well. However we need testers to try all possible
configurations so when we'll do the call for testing you are more than welcome
to report tests that fail.

Best regards,

Thomas



--
-Austin

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]