Re: [Tinycc-devel] State of the tcc project (jiang)

[Aidan Dodds]

I see now that must be intentional, but that's also very dangerous.

It looks like you are trying to reproduce a gcc bug, why not make that 
optional?  Perhaps proposing a compatibility mode if it would be a useful
thing to have.

Even if its sensible, you should really control what garbage data you 
are throwing out from that format specifier.  Why not generate a random
value to Emmit?  That would seem safer for a large number of reasons.

I should point out I don't know what problem you are trying to solve, 
this just strikes me as very dodgy code, especially when it seems you are
purposefully break working code, to implement a bug.  That surely 
effects everyone using tcc.


On 20/06/2014 11:08, Aidan Dodds wrote:
> On 20/06/2014 06:58, jiang wrote:
> > printf("%d %d %d %d %d\n",
> > +           st1.f2, st1.f3, st1.f4, st1.f5); 
>
> Am i being stupid, or do you specify 5 format specifiers with only 4 
> arguments?!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel