|
From: | Stefano Zaglio |
Subject: | Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C |
Date: | Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:42:38 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
Hi,maybe in the future we will find that the OOP and meta-templates are based on erroneous principles and that abstraction is a result of fantasy and not of imagination.
What I ask to myself is why we can write A+B thinking to it as +(A, B) but not write f(x, y) asx.f(y) without major theories.Amazes inventiveness of those who conceived and developed Emscripten that allow us to write web app in C/C++.
s. Il 28/04/2015 18:57, address@hidden ha scritto:
Hi, Since version 4.8, gcc is now c++. clang is c++. Furthermore, the c++ standardization body is going bersek in complexity (c++11->c++14...). I'm worried about compiling an "everyday use" c++ compiler from a C compiler on on a medium term timeframe. Some critical "user level" applications are written in the latest c++ dialect, and this dialect will soon be compilable only with c++ written c++ compiler, hence shutting down for good any C compiler. I did not say I like c++, quite the opposite actually: I would rather port to C89/99 any "critical" c++ components. What are you thoughts about this issue? regards,
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |