[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] -Wl,-rpath not passed through?
From: |
Michael Matz |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] -Wl,-rpath not passed through? |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Jun 2016 01:27:55 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07) |
Hi,
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016, David Mertens wrote:
Nice. I am not very familiar with this part of tcc, but I noticed the
use of ':' as a path separator. Is this the path separator used across
all platforms?
Yes. On all those that support DT_RPATH or DT_RUNPATH, which is an
ELFism ...
In particular, what about Windows?
... and hence Windows simply doesn't and isn't affected.
Also, I am not sure what others think about the first line in which you
declare two integers and initialize them with the return values of
function calls. I guess that's fine, but I don't see it often in the
codebase. @Everyone, do we have a coding standard about this?
No. IMHO it's fine. Push to mob.
Ciao,
Michael.
- [Tinycc-devel] -Wl,-rpath not passed through?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/06/02
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] -Wl,-rpath not passed through?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/06/04
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] -Wl,-rpath not passed through?, David Mertens, 2016/06/04
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] -Wl,-rpath not passed through?,
Michael Matz <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] -Wl,-rpath not passed through?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] -Wl,-rpath not passed through?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] -Wl,-rpath not passed through?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] -Wl,-rpath not passed through?, Michael Matz, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] -Wl,-rpath not passed through?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/06/06