[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc
|
From: |
Daniel Glöckner |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc |
|
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:59:36 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:41:49AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> AFAIK, both are correct.
It depends on the ABI. The ARM EABI defines those details in
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0042f/IHI0042F_aapcs.pdf
section 7.1.7. But I don't know if we adhere to those rules when
compiling for ARM.
Best regards,
Daniel
- [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc, David Mertens, 2016/10/17
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc, Richard Brett, 2016/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc, Christian Jullien, 2016/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc, Vincent Lefevre, 2016/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc,
Daniel Glöckner <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc, Vincent Lefevre, 2016/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc, David Mertens, 2016/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc, Michael Matz, 2016/10/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc, David Mertens, 2016/10/20
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Weird bitfield size handling, discrepancy with gcc, Michael Matz, 2016/10/24