|
From: | Michael Matz |
Subject: | Re: [Tinycc-devel] Ready for Release 0.9.27 |
Date: | Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:54:36 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: | Alpine 2.20 (LSU 67 2015-01-07) |
Hi, On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, grischka wrote:
FYI, GCC 6 behaves in the same way with -std=c89, -std=c99 and -std=c11. Ditto for Clang 3.9.I wouldn't really mind if we change the behavior.
I think we should. If still for 0.9.27 I don't know. It's a subtle change breaking stuff in strange corners.
Ciao, Michael.
Basically tccgen.c contains 8 lines (in gen_op/expr_cond) similar to if ((t1 & (VT_BTYPE | VT_UNSIGNED)) == (VT_LLONG | VT_UNSIGNED) ... if ((t1 & (VT_BTYPE | VT_UNSIGNED)) == (VT_INT | VT_UNSIGNED) ... Maybe we just need to change these like this if ((t1 & (VT_BTYPE | VT_UNSIGNED | VT_BITFIELD)) == .... Note that VT_BITFIELD set implies bit-field width < original type width. --- grischka _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |