[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] main does not returns 0 by default (at least on Windo
From: |
Christian Jullien |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] main does not returns 0 by default (at least on Windows) |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Nov 2017 07:13:56 +0100 |
After checking again, this section actually comes from ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E).
ISO/IEC 9899:1990 (E) only says that result is unspecified.
So tcc is compatible with C90, i.e. undefined. Which is correct since it
pretends itself tcc_define_symbol(s, "__STDC_VERSION__", "199901L");)
Three reasons to make it C99 compatible:
- It behaves differently from Visual C and gcc
- C90 is quite old and tcc looks to want to support more C99 and even C11
features.
- Wikipedia page claims it supports much of the C99 ISO standard, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiny_C_Compiler
Btw, I added a TinyCC link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_C
C.
-----Original Message-----
From: Edmund Grimley Evans [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: mercredi 22 novembre 2017 14:20
To: Christian JULLIEN
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] main does not returns 0 by default (at least on
Windows)
> Testing mob on Windows, I see that tcc is not C90 compliant on default
> return type :
>
>
>
> From C90 :
>
>
>
> 5.1.2.2.3 Program termination
>
>
>
> [#1] If the return type of the main function is a type
>
> compatible with int, a return from the initial call to the
>
> main function is equivalent to calling the exit function
>
> with the value returned by the main function as its
>
> argument;10) reaching the } that terminates the main
>
> function returns a value of 0.
Are you sure you're quoting C90 there and not C99?
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] main does not returns 0 by default (at least on Windows),
Christian Jullien <=