[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Regarding Long double Constant
|
From: |
Vincent Lefevre |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Regarding Long double Constant |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:11:48 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.0.5+111 (106ff19a) vl-132933 (2021-02-08) |
On 2021-02-11 13:49:48 +0100, Christian Jullien wrote:
> No, I think he probably meant (1F-1F) to get 0.0F value?
In the other function, f1 is a variable. I don't see why (1F-1F)
would be used: 0.0F would be simpler, and even that, there should
be no difference with 0.0, because the zero is converted to
long double (and this is why Ayush complained). Still, I don't
see the reason of the change.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)