Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re : Re: Re : Some questions regarding of TCC's optimizations.

[Brian Callahan]

Hello --

I am on this list, you know :)

There may well be opportunities in tcc for a peephole optimizer
approach, but I'll caution that each compiler is different and that blog
post was examining QBE, so it wouldn't necessarily be a direct 1:1
mapping. QBE does a lot of optimization itself before writing out its
final assembly.

~Brian

On 4/4/2022 10:26 AM, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
> After reading this https://briancallahan.net/blog/20220330.html and
> using a citation on this list about dumping the ASM generated by TCC
> using objdump maybe we can find patterns on the generated code and
> identify where it's produced and update then.
> 
> On 31/3/22 20:16, rempas via Tinycc-devel wrote:
>> 31 Μαρ 2022, 19:35 Από david.koch@libertysurf.fr:
>>
>>> Have a look : https://github.com/adorad/tcc and
>>> https://github.com/adorad/adorad
>>>
>>> ----- Mail d'origine -----
>>> De: rempas via Tinycc-devel <tinycc-devel@nongnu.org>
>>> À: Tinycc Devel <tinycc-devel@nongnu.org>
>>> Cc: rempas@tutanota.com, Tinycc Devel <tinycc-devel@nongnu.org>
>>> Envoyé: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 21:12:37 +0200 (CEST)
>>> Objet: Re: [Tinycc-devel]  Re :  Some questions regarding of TCC's
>>> optimizations.
>>>
>> Thanks a lot! I will look at it!
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tinycc-devel mailing list
>> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel