Sorry I guess I'm not familiar with TCC, but I suppose this is
something TCC hasn't implemented yet? having dug into the archives a
little more the only other mention of complex type support with TCC
was in 2015.
https://www.mail-archive.com/tinycc-devel@nongnu.org/msg06428.html
If complex types are not supported are there known work-arounds other
than "dont use them"?
Thanks
Chris
On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 at 09:03, Domingo Alvarez Duarte <mingodad@gmail.com> wrote:
The problem seem to be related with "Complex" rather than "lapacke":
====
#include <stdio.h>
#include <complex.h>
int main() {
printf("Hello World!\n");
return 0;
}
====
Output:
====
tcc -c cmath.c
In file included from cmath.c:2:
In file included from /usr/include/complex.h:106:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/cmathcalls.h:55: error: ';' expected
(got "cacos")
====
Output of preprocessing:
====
/tcc -E cmath.c
...
# 106 "/usr/include/complex.h"
# 1 "/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/cmathcalls.h" 1
# 55 "/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/cmathcalls.h"
extern double _Complex cacos (double _Complex __z) ; extern double
_Complex __cacos (double _Complex __z) ;
...
====
On 9/4/22 2:03, Christopher Choi wrote:
#include <lapacke.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
printf("Hello World!\n");
return 0;
}
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel