[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] new tcc release
From: |
Christian JULLIEN |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] new tcc release |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jul 2022 06:50:50 +0200 (CEST) |
Yessss please.
Christian Jullien
----------------
Le 08/07/2022, à 04:30, Ziyao a écrit :
I vote yes.It is the time for a new release.
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:39:43AM +0200, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> <html><body><br/>The last tcc release is very old, <br/>and tcc has received
> many fixes and new features since then.<br/><br/><br/>What are the plans for
> a new release?<br/><br/><br/>I vote for a 0.9.28 rc with the current
> features, <br/>see, what simple fixes are possible <br/>and then make a
> release in the next weeks.<br/>(Would help distros to include a recent
> tcc)<br/><br/>Afterwarde prepare for tcc 1.0 later this year.<br/>That would
> make it possible for distros to add<br/>tcc 1.0 in there spring/LTS
> releases.<br/><br/>Unfortunately, we missed the 20. anniversary for tcc
> 1.0<br/>(first commit: 27. Oct. 2001),<br/>but releasing at the 21.
> anniversary is still possible.<br/><br/><br/>For 1.0, i vote for fixing more
> bugs and verified C99 support, <br/>either excluding Complex math or
> <br/>with optional Complex math <br/>(enable during configure, but defaults
> 'off')<br/><br/>tcc already understand some C11 features<br/>and
> newer extensions (example: __has_include)<br/>but the related implementation
> <br/>is missing or buggy (_Atomic)<br/><br/>I would see fixes for C11 things
> as 'cool, when working', <br/>but optional for tcc 1.0.<br/><br/>What
> are you think?<br/><br/><br/><br/>-- <br/>Regards,
> Detlef<br/><br/></body></html>
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel