Re: [Tinycc-devel] TCC is fast (yarpgen testing)

[austin 128]

How efficient Is the code at runtime comparitively to gcc or clang

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023, 5:34 PM <wine.dev@web.de> wrote:

yarpgen_1 in C99 mode with seed 7124
is a really hard beast.

func.c is 538536173 bytes
(yes, more than 500MB)


clang needs 11min 9sec to compile func.c.

tcc needs 12.7 seconds to compile func.c

gcc needs too much memory
and my laptop with 12GB swaped
for 79 minutes


Can someone mit more RAM please
retry my test and post the results?


_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel