Re: [Traverso-devel] Un/redo for Fade bend/strength/reset

[ben levitt]

Well, the reason I think it should be un/redoable is because I think
that anything that changes the song should be undoable, so that if you
go back in the history stack to any given position, the song will be
in the old state it was in at that point in history.  Otherwise I feel
that the history stack lacks integrity.

I realize that it can make the history large, but so can lots of
microadjustments to a clip's position, gain, etc.  I think music
editing inherently involves lots of little  adjustments, which only
increases the importance of a large, solid, navigable history stack.
:)

Ben


On 4/30/07, Remon <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello Traversers,
>
> Ben posted a wish in the tracker for this.
>
> Currently, those actions are not un/redoable, but it's trivial to make that
> work.
> However, I'm not sure if it makes sense, and those actions have been made
> non-historable on purpose actually.
>
> What do you guys think, should it be un/redoable or not?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Remon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Traverso-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/traverso-devel