Re: [Traverso-devel] back and a rfc

[JC Cheloven]

I think  >=4.6 is the way. 
The possible problem for a (doubtfully existing?) legacy user does not compare to the inconvenience of maintaining backwards compatibility. 

Furthermore, updating is cheap. My opinion though.

JC
___________________________

2010/10/15 Remon Sijrier <address@hidden>

> My distro already ships 4.7.0.

Same here :)

> Was it only 4.5.x that was troublesome? If so, I don't think a single
> version should hold T back.

Qt 4.5 had some painting issues, and Qt 4.6 introduced painting changes which
had to be taken into account. Everything after Qt 4.6 works fine here, no
painting issues anymore.

Remon

_______________________________________________
Traverso-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/traverso-devel