[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [VM] Exchange 2010 IMAP4 & storing "filed"
From: |
John Stoffel |
Subject: |
Re: [VM] Exchange 2010 IMAP4 & storing "filed" |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:38:45 -0400 |
>>>>> "Uday" == Uday S Reddy <address@hidden> writes:
Uday> Kyle Farrell writes:
>> Attempting to store any flag the server doesn't recognize is causing
>> none of the flags to be stored. I would guess the right thing for VM
>> to do would be only attempt to store flags that are explicitly
>> recognized by the server.
Uday> I don't think you meant that. The "right thing" for VM to do is
Uday> to follow the standard.
Yes, that would be ideal. But when the server doesn't implement the
standard properly, what else are we to do?
Uday> You, or somebody on your behalf, is paying money to Microsoft to
Uday> deliver quality software. It is their job to ask Microsoft to
Uday> do the "right thing". So far, I don't see any evidence that
Uday> this has been done.
Sure, and someday pigs will fly as MS ships a perfectly conformant
IMAP server implementation.
Uday> I will find some work around so that you don't have to put up
Uday> with too much pain. But I don't regard it as my job to change
Uday> VM to work with bad servers.
Sure, I can understand your frustration, but I'm hoping this won't be
a big problem to fix. I think that maybe the change could be
localized to vm-imap.el with a variable that us poor suffering fools
would have to use, which restricts FLAGS.SILENT usage when stupid
servers are in the loop.
Maybe I'll be able to whip up a test patch later on to see how it
works.
Quick question though, how is the best way to force VM to re-read
vm-imap.el as I'm hacking away on it? load-library?
John