[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy...
From: |
Bill Lance |
Subject: |
Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy... |
Date: |
Tue, 7 May 2002 14:49:24 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Chris Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Saturday 04 May 2002 00:45, Bill Lance wrote:
> > --- address@hidden wrote:
> > > I agree with the looseness of LDS within a
> cluster
> > > but a 2 phase commit will
> > > provide better reliability and rollback support.
> >
> > How can we do it without locking up processes?
>
> Well, you're running within a middleware.
Hehe ,, I keep trying to add more to this thread, but
realized that GW will do some of what we are taking
about, but other stuff will be application level, ...
and I don't yet know where to draw the line.
Guess we will have to wait to see what you are coming
up with, Chris.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
- Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., morphius, 2002/05/03
- Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., morphius, 2002/05/03
- Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., Bill Lance, 2002/05/03
- Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., Chris Smith, 2002/05/07
- Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy...,
Bill Lance <=
- Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., Chris Smith, 2002/05/08
- Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., Bill Lance, 2002/05/08
- Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., Chris Smith, 2002/05/08
Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., morphius, 2002/05/07
Fwd: Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., Chris Smith, 2002/05/08
Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., Chris Smith, 2002/05/08
Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., morphius, 2002/05/08