[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version
From: |
h.g. muller |
Subject: |
Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:02:27 +0200 |
I tend to agree: this version was meant as a merge only, not for adding ne
features.
XBoard is still so far behind WinBoard that we easily could spend a year
programming
to get it upto standards. We'd better resist that urge. I think what we
have now is a very
clear improvement over what people are used to with 4.2.7. That should be
enough.
(It must be stablle, though; 4.2.7 was stable...)
Furthermore, 'gift wrapping' xboard in a script seems a dead-end route to me.
There is nothing that you cannot do with shell scripts, sh is a recursive
programming
language. But we don't want xboard to become a scripted GUI. If there is
important
functionality that it lacks, we should implement it in the C code, not
cloak it inscripting.
- [XBoard-devel] beta version, Arun Persaud, 2009/07/14
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, Eric Mullins, 2009/07/14
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, h.g. muller, 2009/07/14
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, Eric Mullins, 2009/07/14
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, Arun Persaud, 2009/07/14
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version,
h.g. muller <=
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, Eric Mullins, 2009/07/14
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, Eric Mullins, 2009/07/14
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, h.g. muller, 2009/07/14
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, Eric Mullins, 2009/07/14
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, h.g. muller, 2009/07/15
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, Arun Persaud, 2009/07/14
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, Arun Persaud, 2009/07/14
- Re: [XBoard-devel] beta version, Tim Mann, 2009/07/18
- Re: [XBoard-devel] gtk-version, Arun Persaud, 2009/07/20
- Re: [XBoard-devel] gtk-version, h . g . muller, 2009/07/21