Re: [Xnee-devel] [Fwd: Re: [sr #103871] Verifying GUI-Testresults with xnee using the Tool "xgrabsc"]

[Henrik Sandklef]

> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Veijo Ryhänen <address@hidden>
> > To: Henrik Sandklef <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Dirk Kaplick <address@hidden>, Henrik Sandklef
> > <address@hidden>
> > Subject: Re: [sr #103871] Verifying GUI-Testresults with xnee using
> > the Tool "xgrabsc"
> > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:01:19 +0200
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I am wondering why ImageMagic import screen capture program works
> > almost three times more slowly than xwd ? I checked both .xwd files
> > with xwud -command and I did not find any visible difference between
> > them.
> > (For details, see the end of my message)

If xwd is faster, we'll use that :)

> > How are you planning to calculate checksum ? My choice was adler32
> > instead of md5sum
> > when I did java -program, because Adler32 was much, much more faster
> > than md5sum.

I really think checksum should be calculated after the session is
recorded/replayed....


By doing so the time it takes to calculate the checksum is not important. Of 
course, I assume that the checksum isn't used to take some kind of decision 
during replay (e.g stop the replaying since the pics differ).



/hesa