[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets
From: |
Arwed von Merkatz |
Subject: |
Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Aug 2003 03:37:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 05:23:46PM -0700, David Ross wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden
> > [mailto:address@hidden
> > On Behalf Of Tyler Hall
> > Sent: 2003 August 29 7:53 PM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets
> ...
> <snipped>
> ...
> > And what if I'm a user (not a developer) who wants to download the
> > latest driver for my 3dfx card in my i386-based machine,
> > should I have to:
> > - download the full source tree
> > - patch the files scattered throughout the full tree to implement the
> > driver update
> > - compile the _full_ tree (because I just downloaded it and haven't
> > compiled it before), including even the SPARC video drivers
> > OR would be more convenient to:
> > - download the XCommon, XServerLib, XVideoDriver-3dfx
> > packages (or if I
> > already had the tree downloaded I can just download the
> > XVideoDriver-3dfx package to replace the older one)
> > - ./configure examines what I have and don't have, adjusts Makefiles
> > accordingly
> > - compile the stuff I want, only the stuff I want.
> >
> > Keeping the tree as it stands right now offers no such modularity. We
> > need to reorganize the source to allow such modularity, not
> > just to make
> > life easier for binary packers, but for those developers who wish to
> > contribute to just one module.
> >
> > Tyler
> >
>
> Hi All,
>
> I absolutely agree that what should be compiled should only be what is
> needed, and/or only what is needed should be loaded. Similar to the
> Linux method of configuration for compilation and for the modules too.
> But what I have read about imake vs. the GNU Autotools is that imake is
> not very flexible in this regard. Or am I dead wrong? Perhaps we need
> to add another level/layer of abstraction on top of imake? I also read
> that there where some other problems with imake because it used the
> c-pre-processor, what has/have your experiences been?
It is already possible to configure the xfree build process to only
compile and install stuff you want/need. It can all be configure in the
host.def, which drivers to compile, which apps, which libs, ...
All that is needed is imho a nice dialog based config tool to do this.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz
Grimoire Guru for video
Grimoire Guru for xfce
Sourcemage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
- Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, (continued)
- Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, weigelt, 2003/08/29
- Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, Alan Cox, 2003/08/29
- Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, Tyler Hall, 2003/08/29
- [xougen] building just the drivers you need (was: Regarding server side widgets), Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2003/08/30
- Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, weigelt, 2003/08/30
- RE: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, David Ross, 2003/08/30
- Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets,
Arwed von Merkatz <=
- Re: [xougen] Building from source [was: Regarding server side widgets], Mark C. Ballew, 2003/08/31
- Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, Eric Anholt, 2003/08/29
- Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, Eric Anholt, 2003/08/31
Re: [xougen] Regarding server side widgets, Alan Cox, 2003/08/27