[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xougen] Re: Adding cruft to X

From: Tupshin Harper
Subject: Re: [xougen] Re: Adding cruft to X
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 20:18:19 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2

Steve Nickolas wrote:

You can get all of that without adding on to X, I think, by writing a system that is X-like in nature and which runs alongside (but completely oblivious to) X - plus, you have the advantage that console apps like sox, ogg123, etc. can be written to use it, even without X available. This is, IMHO (and I don't think I'm alone) the best approach.

I know I tend to sound a bit befuddled, I hope this is a sufficient explanation why I think sound support should NOT be part of X.


What you absolutely cannot get without awareness (at a fairly low level) of X, is synchronization. See my earlier message about that.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]