xwem-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[XWEM]: Re: xwem and gnus


From: Steve Youngs
Subject: [XWEM]: Re: xwem and gnus
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 06:26:02 +1000
User-agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux)

* Sergey Bolshakov <address@hidden> writes:

  > one security-braindamaged distro :) has X running with -nolisten
  > tcp by default,

Oh god!  You are kidding?  Ok, here are my guesses in order of most
likely to least likely...

    RedCrap/Fuckora
    Gentoilet
    Dumbian
    Mandrunk
    Suckie
    Anything else that isn't Slackware or LFS

And for those of you that don't speak Steve-ese, that list would
translate to...

    RedHat/Fedora
    Gentoo
    Debian
    Mandrake
    Suse

  > so having option to connect via unix socket would be fine.

Would that even be possible?  I thought X only listened on TCP
sockets?  But then again, how do other WM's opperate under `-nolisten
tcp'? 

  >> gnus people most possible will answer: "We can't do anything with
  >> it, because we have no control, XEmacs just blocks waiting for
  >> connection." :)

  > Yeah.

You bet we'd say that.

  >> BTW: please post a screenshot of your xwem desktop somewhere.

  > Nothing special, especially in comparision with SY ones.

Mine aren't _that_ good.  But thanks for the compliment. :-)

  > PS SY: nice 404 :)

Yeah, it's cool isn't it? :-P

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
|                   Te audire no possum.                   |
|             Musa sapientum fixa est in aure.             |
|----------------------------------<address@hidden>---|

Attachment: pgpbcEiyxV8dN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]