[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a rather larger inconvience
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: a rather larger inconvience |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Aug 2024 17:22:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
> Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
> I'm not sure if it's best to leave it to me, but can you please apply
> this small change to `TeX-command-list' and try it again?
I have plain confidence in your coding and rightly so 😉. I applied the
patch, recompiled, tested and voila it works as expected
> diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el
> index 93f22520..e261b821 100644
> --- a/tex.el
> +++ b/tex.el
> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ If nil, none is specified."
> ("Ps2pdf" "ps2pdf %f %(O?pdf)" TeX-run-ps2pdf nil
> (plain-TeX-mode LaTeX-mode docTeX-mode AmSTeX-mode Texinfo-mode)
> :help "Convert PostScript file to PDF")
> - ("LaTeXMk" "latexmk %(latexmk-out) %(file-line-error) \
> + ("LaTeXMk" "latexmk %(latexmk-out) %(file-line-error) %(output-dir) \
> %`%(extraopts) %S%(mode)%' %t"
> TeX-run-format nil (LaTeX-mode docTeX-mode) :help "Run LaTeXMk")
> ("Glossaries" "makeglossaries %(d-dir) %s" TeX-run-command nil
> You can also add '%(output-dir)' to the LaTeXMk entry via the custom
> interface and save it for the current session; that will save you the
> apply/compilation time.
Yeah, but I prefer not to mess with the custom interface and leave that
as a method of last resort. Every time you guys add some new commands the
customized variable is basically useless. 🙃
Uwe
> Best, Arash
--
I strongly condemn Hamas heinous despicable pogroms/atrocities on Israel
I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against Ukraine.
I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military.
I support the EU and NATO membership of Ukraine.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- Re: support for latexmk?, (continued)
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- [a rather larger inconvience] (was: support for latexmk?), Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/17
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Paul Nelson, 2024/08/17
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/18
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/21
- Re: a rather larger inconvience,
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/21
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/22
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/22
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Ikumi Keita, 2024/08/22
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/22