[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] required-extension-version (possible version-numbe
From: |
Leonardo Valeri Manera |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] required-extension-version (possible version-numbers> issue) |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:08:01 +0200 |
On 15/04/2008, Ivan Raikov <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> I don't understand what you mean by that. As long as a version is
> defined as a dotted list of integers in decimal representation, 1.501
> > 1.6.0. If you want your release versions to be ordered correctly,
> then those version numbers have to be a well-ordered sequence in
> increasing order and consistent representation. You can't go from
> release 1.16 to Aleph.XVII and expect that chicken-setup would know
> what to do.
That is exactly what I mean - version bumps should be identifiable as
such by the versions egg and chicken setup, regardless of the specific
version scheme - x.xx.x, x.x.x.x, x.x.xxx, whatever - used by egg
authors.
Leo