Re: [Chicken-hackers] cond-expand and macros

[John Cowan]

Kon Lovett scripsit:

> 'cond-expand' uses a function that ensures the tested symbol is a  
> keyword, so 'foo' & '#:foo' are legal.

Fair enough.  But in Chicken 4 syntax-rules macros, the non-keyword form
doesn't match, only the keyword form.  That makes no sense.  It's not
that cond-expand as a whole isn't being recognized, because it is;
it throws an error because there is no match.

-- 
"The serene chaos that is Courage, and the phenomenon   address@hidden
of Unopened Consciousness have been known to the        John Cowan
Great World eons longer than Extaboulism."
"Why is that?" the woman inquired.
"Because I just made that word up", the Master said wisely.
        --Kehlog Albran, The Profit             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan