[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:21:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Felix scripsit:
> So, my opinion is: the current situation is allright for us, good for
> the user, but mildly inconvenient for some developers. Making things
> more convenient is something I can understand. But, I must insist on
> one thing: no broken links. never.
+1, or rather +100.
--
John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
[T]here is a Darwinian explanation for the refusal to accept Darwin.
Given the very pessimistic conclusions about moral purpose to which his
theory drives us, and given the importance of a sense of moral purpose
in helping us cope with life, a refusal to believe Darwin's theory may
have important survival value. --Ian Johnston
- [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal, Peter Bex, 2011/03/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal, Thomas Chust, 2011/03/03
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal, Felix, 2011/03/04
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal, Christian Kellermann, 2011/03/14
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal, John Cowan, 2011/03/14
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal, John Gabriele, 2011/03/14
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal, Felix, 2011/03/15
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal, John Gabriele, 2011/03/15
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal, Jim Ursetto, 2011/03/15
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal, Peter Bex, 2011/03/15
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal, Jim Ursetto, 2011/03/15