[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling
From: |
Jörg F . Wittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:46:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux armv7l; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0 |
Am 19.02.2016 um 14:02 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
> Now I see the low load case to be almost 50% faster and the old code to
> be 30% faster and more stable on delivering responses. I have no idea
> what the combined effect would be.
>
> How do we deal with this?
I opened ticket 1259 for this.
To make the kind reviewers job easier, I'll post diffs in piecemeal here.
Details to follow below.
Cheers
/Jörg
To follow the related changes:
1. Apply
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2016-02/msg00032.html
this should just fix a bug
2. Apply
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2016-02/msg00033.html
3. Apply the attached patch.
This only adds comments: Section headers large enough for "meld" at
least to pick up the difference. (To both the original and master.)
You want this to make head or tail of the upcoming changes. Eventually
there will have to be a cleanup diff to get rid of them.
0101-add-sectionmarkers.patch
Description: Text Data
- [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/19
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling,
Jörg F . Wittenberger <=
- [Chicken-hackers] PATCH Re: slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/19
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, felix . winkelmann, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24