[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling
|
From: |
Peter Bex |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling |
|
Date: |
Sun, 21 Feb 2016 19:52:41 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 07:43:06PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> IMHO the patch in
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2016-02/msg00032.html
> SHOULD be applied - it fixes a serious bug.
This is a very invasive change. Do you have a test case that shows
how this breaks?
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/19
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/19
- [Chicken-hackers] PATCH Re: slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/19
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, felix . winkelmann, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, Peter Bex, 2016/02/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] slow polling, felix . winkelmann, 2016/02/24