[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro
From: |
Kooda |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jan 2017 02:43:09 +0100 |
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 21:34:16 +0100
Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
> I really hate playing this stupid game of whack-a-mole with header
> definitions (there seems to be no sane combination of definitions that
> will work on all OSes). Instead, I think it's better to just give in
> and add the --std=gnu99 on all platforms where we're using gcc and
> clang. I'd appreciate if you guys could test this on a x86_64 Windows
> to see if that also fixes the warnings you saw before.
I don’t like to be the bearer of bad news but it shows the warning with
--std=gnu99 here…
- [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro, Evan Hanson, 2017/01/12
- [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 1/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro, Evan Hanson, 2017/01/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro, Kooda, 2017/01/14
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro, Peter Bex, 2017/01/14
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro,
Kooda <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro, Peter Bex, 2017/01/15
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro, Evan Hanson, 2017/01/16
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro, Peter Bex, 2017/01/16
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro, Evan Hanson, 2017/01/16
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro, Peter Bex, 2017/01/17
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro, Evan Hanson, 2017/01/18
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 0/1] Add _XOPEN_SOURCE feature test macro, felix . winkelmann, 2017/01/15