Re: [PATCH] warn on unexpected egg-properties

[felix . winkelmann]

> On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 02:59:17PM +0100, felix.winkelmann@bevuta.com wrote:
> > Attached is a patch to address #1492.
> 
> Applied.  Do we want to turn this into an error for CHICKEN 6?
> Warnings have a tendency of just scrolling by and getting lost in the
> noise of compiler output.

Thanks.
 
> OTOH, making it an error would make it harder to add new properties and
> be backward compatible in an egg (though cond-expand would help).

Indeed, that was what I thought as well. It seems we should stay with
warnings for the time being, as the effects are likely to be benign
or will fail to build an egg altogether.


felix