[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [circle] GPL Violatin - no I wont
From: |
Jiri Baum |
Subject: |
Re: [circle] GPL Violatin - no I wont |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:24:22 +1100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
Hello,
David Irvine:
> 1: Everyone is a p2p client or server (attached direct or through a
> firewall), whatever that's called leaf node or whatever. Basically if
> your directly connected I want others behind firewall to connect through
> you or vice versa.
You will have to deal with (a) NAT and (b) firewalls. Both of these are
difficult, and both of them are a problem for Circle.
> 3: Everything is anonymous - or at least mostly !!
Circle is not anonymous at all - everyone knows everybody else's IP address.
If you want Freenet, you know where to look for it.
Speaking of Freenet, what would your system do that others don't do already?
Why will anyone use yours, rather than Freenet, or eDonkey, or whatever?
> After I have paid my debts and made a small profit (to allow me to live for
> a bit longer) then the system will change license.
Not with my code you won't.
Jiri
--
Jiri Baum <address@hidden> http://www.baum.com.au/~jiri
MAT LinuxPLC project --- http://mat.sf.net --- Machine Automation Tools
- Re: [circle] GPL Violatin - no I wont, (continued)
- Re: [circle] GPL Violatin - no I wont, Jiri Baum, 2006/01/19
- Re: [circle] GPL Violatin - no I wont, Jiri Baum, 2006/01/19
- Re: [circle] GPL Violation - no I wont, David Irvine, 2006/01/19
- Re: [circle] GPL Violation - no I wont, darkblood, 2006/01/19
- Re: [circle] GPL Violation - no I wont, David Irvine, 2006/01/19
- Re: [circle] GPL Violation - no I wont, Jiri Baum, 2006/01/19
- Re: [circle] GPL Violation - no I wont, David Irvine, 2006/01/20
- Re: [circle] GPL Violation - no I wont, Jiri Baum, 2006/01/22
- Re: [circle] GPL Violation - no I wont, David Irvine, 2006/01/22
- Re: [circle] GPL Violation - no I wont, Thomas Mangin, 2006/01/25
- Re: [circle] GPL Violatin - no I wont,
Jiri Baum <=