[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type
From: |
stefan |
Subject: |
Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jul 2001 15:14:37 +0200 (CEST) |
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Martin Grabmueller wrote:
> - I think `binary-search' should return #f instead of -1, because that
> is how it is done in string searching procedures, and because it is
> more useful. Then you can use the result directly in `if's without
> comparing it to another number:
I accept this. You recognized it: I wanted it to work like strings.
> - Maybe `binary-set!' should also support exact numbers as the last
> argument?
Hm. The argument is checked against char's only. Good idea.
> - `binary-concat' should be `binary-concat!' because it has a side
> effect on the binary argument.
So all things having effect on the argument are suffixed by "!" ?
> - What about making the last argument to `binary-subset' an optional
> argument? That would mean:
Good idea, too. Also I would like it more (binary-subset start length)
which would be more like the (substring) thingy.
> If you agree with one or more of the above suggestions, I can help
> implementing them, of course. Just drop me a note.
Your help is welcome. Please do so.
Cheers,
address@hidden
- [dev-serveez] binary data type, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/20
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type,
stefan <=
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/23
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, stefan, 2001/07/24
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, stefan, 2001/07/27
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/28
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, stefan, 2001/07/28
- Re: [dev-serveez] binary data type, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/30