dragora-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Dragora-users] Some issues with the Dragora website


From: Chris F.A. Johnson
Subject: Re: [Dragora-users] Some issues with the Dragora website
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:17:13 -0500 (EST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)

On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Matias Fonzo wrote:

El 2019-11-13 21:56, Chris F.A. Johnson escribi?:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Michael Siegel wrote:

Am 13.11.19 um 22:10 schrieb Chris F.A. Johnson:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Michael Siegel wrote:
...
? I don't like underlining links (except on :hover). I prefer to make
? them stand out with bold. I saw this on a site several years ago
? and liked it. It seems to be used fairly often these days.

I have to disagree on that. Off the top of my head, I can't think of any
site that does it like that. But that's subjective, of course. My real
point is that making bold text indicate hyperlinks is not a good idea.

   Well the first four sites I went to after reading your comment
   don't have the links underlined:

         https://www.canadiantire.ca/en.html
         http://carlo-domeniconi.com/
         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
         https://www.audubon.org/birds-of-america

   And I've gone to a few other sites since I made note of those, and
   NONE have the links underlined (execpt on :hover, if then).

I just found more information about this, here:

https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/F73.html

   ...where it says:

   Procedure

      Check that each link in the page that is identifiable by color
      (hue) is visually identifiable via some other means (e.g.,
      underlined, bolded, italicized, sufficient difference in
      lightness, etc).



--
   Chris F.A. Johnson                         <http://cfajohnson.com/>
   =========================== Author: ===============================
   Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
   Pro Bash Programming: Scripting the GNU/Linux shell (2009, Apress)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]