fenfire-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fenfire-dev] Summary regarding single branch


From: Benja Fallenstein
Subject: Re: [Fenfire-dev] Summary regarding single branch
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 20:48:28 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040708)


Hi!

Matti Katila wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Benjamin-Elias Fallenstein wrote:
def write(graph): to def write(graph, outputstream=None):

That's exactly how I want to do it. The point was that when the writer is in Fenfire, and the added feature is needed in Loom, then both Loom and Fenfire need to be changed to do it the way you say.

No. That change doesn't break anything because the function is overloaded.
Everything old still works.

I said that both Loom and Fenfire need to be changed.

Fenfire needs to be changed if the change is to be in writer.py. Loom needs to be changed if it is to make use of the new feature.

I want to do it the way you say, and therefore, I want to be allowed to change both projects at the same time :-)

Yes I understand that you want to change but I think you need first to make the change in fenfire and then in ex-loom because of ex-loom depends of fenfire.

?

Why can't it be made in both projects at the same time?

The change in loom is binded with the change in fenfire but not atomic in sense that there are also three other programs that use the same writer.

'Atomic' means that both changes happen in one commit. I don't understand what you mean by 'three other programs that use the same writer' and what it has to do with whether the change is atomic? =)

Cheers,
- Benja




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]