[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] independent src/doc vs shared src/doc
From: |
Albert Chu |
Subject: |
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] independent src/doc vs shared src/doc |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:32:41 -0700 |
> I like the shared folder structure.
>
> I am curious to hear Al and Ian's recommendations, as they are
> going to handle Debian and RedHat packaging.
Personally, I like the shared folder structure too. Packaging shouldn't
be an issue either way as long as the Makefiles install everything in
the right place.
By the way, just so I get numbering conventions correct. Are we doing
the following?
freeipmi-0-1-0-alpha6.qa0
freeipmi-0-1-0-alpha6.qa1
...
freeipmi-0-1-0-beta0
freeipmi-0-1-0-beta1
...
freeipmi-0-1-0
Al
--
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
----- Original Message -----
From: Anand Babu <address@hidden>
Date: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 9:31 pm
Subject: [Freeipmi-devel] independent src/doc vs shared src/doc
>
> Let us finalize on directory structure:
>
> Two proposals:
>
> Shared folder structure:
> ========================
> freeipmi/
> freeipmi/src/
> freeipmi/src/libfreeipmi
> freeipmi/src/fish
> freeipmi/src/ipmipower
> ...
> freeipmi/doc/
> freeipmi/doc/bmc-watchdog
> freeipmi/doc/ipmiping
> ...
>
> Independent folder structure:
> ============================
> freeipmi/libfreeipmi/src
> freeipmi/libfreeipmi/doc
> freeipmi/fish/src
> freeipmi/fish/doc
> freeipmi/fish/extensions
> freeipmi/fish/scripts
> freeipmi/bmc-watchdog/src
> freeipmi/bmc-watchdog/doc
> ....
>
> I like the shared folder structure.
>
> I am curious to hear Al and Ian's recommendations, as they are
> going to handle Debian and RedHat packaging.
>
> --
> Anand Babu
> Free as in Freedom <www.gnu.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeipmi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
>