freeipmi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Freeipmi-devel] [task #3320] sensors output based on critical/non-recov


From: Albert Chu
Subject: [Freeipmi-devel] [task #3320] sensors output based on critical/non-recoverable ranges
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:13:12 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040301

This mail is an automated notification from the task tracker
 of the project: FreeIPMI.




/**************************************************************************/
[task #3320] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=3320>
Project: FreeIPMI
Submitted by: Albert Chu
On: Fri 06/11/2004 at 17:11

Should Start On:  Fri 06/11/2004 at 00:00
Should be Finished on:  Fri 06/11/2004 at 00:00
Category:  None
Priority:  5 - Normal
Resolution:  None
Assigned to:  None
Percent Complete:  0%
Status:  Open
Effort:  0.00


Summary:  sensors output based on critical/non-recoverable ranges

Original Submission:  From email:
-----------

Hey AB,

We've noticed on a thunder that as many as 50% of nodes are showings
alerts for voltage sensors.  I don't believe this is bad, b/c the
voltages are within the lower and upper critical range.  However, since
fish/sensors uses the normal min/max range, many sensors are showing
alerts (IMHO) more often than is appropriate.

I'm in discussion with the admins about their preference for output of
ranges and alerts, but I think something should be changed in
fish/sensors.  If I understand this correctly, we can use the readable
threshold mask (field 20 of the full sensor data record) to determine
which ranges are available.

I'm going to add a feature request on this to FreeIPMI so we don't forget.

Al











For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=3320>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]