freeipmi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Freeipmi-devel] Re: now ipmi-sel is in C


From: Bala.A
Subject: [Freeipmi-devel] Re: now ipmi-sel is in C
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4

Hi Al,

I have already reverted ipmi_lan_sendto(), ipmi_lan_recvfrom() and ipckey
changes back.

Thanks,

Bala
---
Free as in freedom
http://www.gnu.org/


> Hey Bala,
>
> The issue is that this was a maintenance branch, so that code should
> have never been "cleaned up", if there were actually no bugs.
>
> I still think we should still revert the code, so that the differences
> between the different releases are still kept to a minimum.
>
> Al
>
> On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 18:39 -0700, Bala.A wrote:
>> Hi Al,
>>
>> packet retransmission code is only in UDM.  I did code cleanup in
>> ipmi_lan_sendto() and forgot to initialize packet_size variable.
>> Because
>> of that, ipmi_lan_sendto() was failing.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bala
>> ---
>> Free as in freedom
>> http://www.gnu.org/
>>
>>
>> > On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 15:20 -0700, Anand Babu wrote:
>> >> This bug was introduced because of re-transmission feature. I
>> thought,
>> >> that feature was required, so we fix the bug.
>> >
>> > These functions were nearly entirely re-written.  I have no idea why.
>> >
>> > All retransmission code should only be in the UDM code.  None of it
>> > should be in ipmi_lan_sendto().  The ipmi_lan_sendto() in 0.3.0 is
>> still
>> > the same as the code in 0.2.0.
>> >
>> > Al
>> >
>> > --
>> > Albert Chu
>> > address@hidden
>> > 925-422-5311
>> > Computer Scientist
>> > High Performance Systems Division
>> > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
> --
> Albert Chu
> address@hidden
> 925-422-5311
> Computer Scientist
> High Performance Systems Division
> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>
>






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]