Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmimonitoring-sensors.c discretereading workaround

[Florian]

Hey Albert,

The changeing of record_ids and record_ids_length showed the sensor 5 (but no data) like this

Record ID, Sensor Name, Sensor Number, Sensor Type, Sensor State, Sensor Reading, Sensor Units, Sensor Event/Reading Type Code, Sensor Event Bitmask, Sensor Event String
5, Power Meter, 5, Current, N/A, N/A, N/A, 9h, 2h, 'Device Enabled'.

IPMI_MONITORING_FLAGS_DEBUG unfortunately did not add ANY more logs at all, so I tried with IPMI_MONITORING_FLAGS_DEBUG_IPMI_PACKETS which gave me more logs.

Those are quite a lot of more lines, so I pasted it into my privatebin: https://privatebin.florianstroeger.com/?58387298f9b913c4#CkDCOMP5eFXOs6Whn+giWtidWNhMZGrkhc3tXYPaK9o=

I also tried setting discrete_reading to 1 as the sensor 5 was visible with record_ids, but that did output the same results.

Florian

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:07 AM Albert Chu <address@hidden> wrote:

Hey Florian,

Lets try:

unsigned int record_ids[] = {5, 0};                                                                                                      
unsigned int record_ids_length = 1;

and

unsigned int ipmimonitoring_init_flags = IPMI_MONITORING_FLAGS_DEBUG;

Al

On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 20:16 +0100, Florian wrote:
> Oops, I'm sorry, Android-Mail apparently deleted the CC...
>
> I compiled with ipmimonitoring_init_flags = 1 now and got debug stuff
> this time.
>
> The output is following...
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c,
> ipmi_monitoring_get_sensor_reading, 1061): record_type '0xC0' not
> supported
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_bitmask_type, 752):
> event_reading_type_code '0x70' bitmask is OEM
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_bitmask_type, 752):
> event_reading_type_code '0x71' bitmask is OEM
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_bitmask_type, 752):
> event_reading_type_code '0x71' bitmask is OEM
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c,
> ipmi_monitoring_get_sensor_reading, 1061): record_type '0x8' not
> supported
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c,
> ipmi_monitoring_get_sensor_reading, 1061): record_type '0x8' not
> supported
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356):
> ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571):
> cannot read sensor for record id '23'
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356):
> ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571):
> cannot read sensor for record id '24'
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356):
> ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571):
> cannot read sensor for record id '38'
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356):
> ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571):
> cannot read sensor for record id '39'
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356):
> ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571):
> cannot read sensor for record id '40'
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _get_sensor_reading, 356):
> ipmi_sensor_read: sensor reading unavailable
> (ipmi_monitoring_sensor_reading.c, _threshold_sensor_reading, 571):
> cannot read sensor for record id '41'
> Record ID, Sensor Name, Sensor Number, Sensor Type, Sensor State,
> Sensor Reading, Sensor Units, Sensor Event/Reading Type Code, Sensor
> Event Bitmask, Sensor Event String
> ipmi_monitoring_sensor_read_sensor_bitmask_strings: success
>
>
> I'm unfortunately don't know much about C. You mean I should change
> in 'unsigned int record_ids[] = {0};' the 0 to a sensor-id, right?
> Because I did this and that neither worked with putting 5 in for the
> power meter nor with any other sensor.
>
> Florian
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:47 PM Albert Chu <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Didn't see your output, I guess you forgot to paste it in.
> >
> > Hmmmm.  That means the main monitoring code is just returning "0",
> > i.e.
> > 0 sensors read.  Could you try experimenting with the settings and
> > setting "record_ids" to the record we're trying to figure out (i
> > think
> > it was #5 in your prior post).  Lets just concentrate on that
> > specific
> > record and try to figure out what's going on.  Also set
> > ipmimonitoring_init_flags for more debugging and lets see what gets
> > output.
> >
> > BTW, could you please respond to the mailing list.
> >
> > Al
> >
> > On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 07:50 +0100, Florian Ströger wrote:
> > > Hello Albert, 
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the fast reply!
> > > I've set 'int ignore_non_interpretable_sensors' to 0, but when I
> > run
> > > the binary now it just outputs the headers, like this:
> > >                                                
> > -- 
> > Albert Chu
> > address@hidden
> > Computer Scientist
> > High Performance Systems Division
> > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
> >
> >
>
>
--
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

--

Florian Ströger

Zur Rossschwemme 5

3452 Atzenbrugg

****************************