Re: [Freeipmi-users] ipmiconsole BMC Implementation with x38ml

[ktaka]

Hi Al,

Thanks for the suggestion.
Unfortunately, no luck so far.

> Could you try the "solpayloadsize" workaround as well?  For some reason
> that motherboard is reporting bad payload sizes.  If this works, can you
> please send me more detailed specs on that motherboard?  I'll add it
> into the list of motherboards in the manpages/docs.
>
> If it stills fails to work with that workaround and the "authcap"
> workaround, you may want to try the "intel20" workaround as well and see
> if that helps.

x60:~# ipmipower -W authcap -u ktaka -h 192.168.20.116 -s
192.168.20.116: on

x60:~# ipmiconsole -V
ipmiconsole 0.6.7

(1) ipmiconsole -W authcap -u rt -p rt  -h 192.168.20.116
ipmiconsole_submit_block: BMC Implementation

(2) ipmiconsole -W authcap,intel20 -u rt -p rt  -h 192.168.20.116
[error received]: password invalid

(3) ipmiconsole -W authcap,solpayloadsize -u rt -p rt  -h 192.168.20.116

(Never returns to the shell before hitting ^c.)

(4) ipmiconsole -W authcap,solpayloadsize,intel20  -u rt -p rt  -h
192.168.20.116
[error received]: password invalid


(5)
ipmiconsole -u rt -p rt  -h 192.168.20.116
[error received]: username invalid

ipmiconsole -W solpayloadsize -u rt -p rt  -h 192.168.20.116
[error received]: username invalid

ipmiconsole -W intel20 -u rt -p rt  -h 192.168.20.116
[error received]: username invalid

ipmiconsole -W intel20,solpayloadsize -u rt -p rt  -h 192.168.20.116
[error received]: username invalid


The followings are the error messages seen in the debug output.

(1) With authcap workaroud only, I see the following message in the
debug output.

(ipmiconsole_checks.c, ipmiconsole_check_outbound_sequence_number, 254):
hostname=192.168.20.116; protocol_state=0x5: session sequence number
check failed; p = 9; session_sequence_number = 0;
highest_received_sequence_number = 0

(ipmiconsole_processing.c, _check_payload_sizes_legitimate, 2080):
hostname=192.168.20.116; protocol_state=0x8: payload sizes invalid:
max_inbound_payload_size=1024 max_outbound_payload_size=1024

(2) With authcap,intel20, I see the following message.

(ipmiconsole_checks.c,
ipmiconsole_check_rakp_2_key_exchange_authentication_code, 805):
hostname=192.168.20.116; protocol_state=0x3: rakp 2 key exchanged
authentication code check failed; p = 5

(3) With authcap,solpayloadsize, I see the following message repeatedly,
   and the loop seems infinite.

(ipmiconsole_checks.c, ipmiconsole_check_outbound_sequence_number, 254):
hostname=192.168.20.116; protocol_state=0x5: session sequence number
check failed; p = 9; session_sequence_number = 0;
highest_received_sequence_number = 0
(ipmiconsole_processing.c,
_process_protocol_state_activate_payload_sent, 2958):
hostname=192.168.20.116; protocol_state=0x8: trying new port: 6F02

(4) With authcap,solpayloadsize,intel20, I see the following message in
the debug output.

(ipmiconsole_checks.c,
ipmiconsole_check_rakp_2_key_exchange_authentication_code, 805):
hostname=192.168.20.116; protocol_state=0x3: rakp 2 key exchanged
authentication code check failed; p = 5

(5) With any conbination of solpayloadsize,intel20, without authcap,
results in "[error received]: username invalid".
No significant error message in the debug output.

Do you think new workaroud is needed ?

-- 
Best regards,
Kimitoshi Takahshi