freeipmi-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Freeipmi-users] Re: freeipmi


From: Fox, Kevin M
Subject: RE: [Freeipmi-users] Re: freeipmi
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:42:30 -0800

I had the same thought. Yes, it turns out that the rhel5 box that I built it on 
has libgcrypt 1.4.4 running on it since its registered to the RHN. The new box 
I was trying to run freeipmi on hasn't been registered with RHN yet so was 
running 1.2.6. Upgrading to 1.4.4 fixed the problem and its working now.

Thanks,
Kevin
________________________________________
From: Al Chu address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 11:38 AM
To: Fox, Kevin M
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-users] Re: freeipmi

Hey Kevin,

I have an idea.  Did you compile FreeIPMI against one version of
libgcrypt, but are running on a machine w/ a different version of
libgcrypt??

I find it hard to believe that the difference between two versions could
cause this problem, I think it's possible (given the way I'm reading how
the call to 'gcry_check_version' works).  I'll have to think about how I
can return a better error message if this is what's happening.

Al

On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 11:13 -0800, Al Chu wrote:
> Hey Kevin,
>
> The failures seem to be the libgcrypt.  I'm not really sure what it
> could be since it's just doing some library initialization.  What
> version are you running?
>
> Al
>
> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 10:41 -0800, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> > I just tried:
> > 0.7.15
> > 0.7.16
> >
> > address@hidden kfox]# ipmiconsole -h a21-bmc -u XXX -p YYY --debug
> > (ipmiconsole_engine.c, ipmiconsole_engine_setup, 200): ipmi_crypt_init: Bad 
> > file descriptor
> > ipmiconsole_setup: Bad file descriptor
> >
> > address@hidden kfox]# ipmipower --help
> > ipmipower: ipmi_rmcpplus_init
> >
> > Its not clear from a strace what the problem is.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin
--
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]