freeipmi-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Freeipmi-users] Intel SR 1625 Sensors


From: Albert Chu
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-users] Intel SR 1625 Sensors
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:32:39 -0700

Hey Werner, Ben,

Here's a beta that should support those sensor interpretations.  It's
tough for me to test w/o your motherboard in front of me, PLMK if it
works for you.

http://download.gluster.com/pub/freeipmi/qa-release/freeipmi-1.0.4.beta0.tar.gz

Al

On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 03:51 -0700, Werner Fischer wrote:
> Hi Al,
> (sorry for sending it twice, I sent my first email in error only to you, not 
> the list)
> 
> I've been on vacation for some weeks and now back again.
> 
> Benjamin meant with "not detected" that FreeIPMI returns a monitoring
> status of "N/A" for those sensors (not "Nominal"). Unfortunately we
> missed to send the output of "ipmimonitoring --legacy-output
> --interpret-oem-data --quiet-cache --sdr-cache-recreate" (which is used
> by our Nagios plugin):
> 
> Record ID | Sensor Name | Sensor Group | Monitoring Status | Sensor Units | 
> Sensor Reading [...]
> 47 | SMI Timeout | OEM Reserved | N/A | N/A | 'OK'
> [...]
> 55 | P1 VRD Hot | Temperature | N/A | N/A | 'OK'
> 56 | P2 VRD Hot | Temperature | N/A | N/A | 'OK'
> [...]
> 59 | IOH Therm Trip | Temperature | N/A | N/A | 'OK'
> 
> Would it be possible for you to include information about those four
> sensors to future versions of FreeIPMI, so that it reports a monitoring
> status of "Nominal" when the sensor reading is 'OK' as above?
> 
> In case you would need additional information from Intel about those
> sensors, just let me know.
> 
> Best regards and have a nice weekend,
> thank you,
> Werner
> 
> On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 10:06 -0800, Albert Chu wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin,
> > 
> > What do you mean by "not detected"?  It appears everything is fine by
> > the information you list below.
> > 
> > Do you mean these sensors are not reporting actual temperatures?  While
> > these are indeed temperature sensors (identified by the motherboard as
> > such), they do not appear to be sensors that report a temperature
> > reading.  They instead report an event bitmask.  The key is the
> > "event/Readin Type Code" field of each sensor.
> > 
> > Al
> > 
> > On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 23:55 -0800, Benjamin Bayer wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > we have a Intel SR1625 wehre some Sensors not detected with FreeIPMI 
> > > Version 1.0.2.beta3.
> > >  
> > > Thank You.
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > 
> > > Benjamin Bayer
> 
-- 
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]