Re: [Gcl-devel] difficulties with, with-standard-io and defpackage

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!  Again, I think you want the ansi image.  We support the
older CLtL1 image for applications that have used it for years.

GCL_ANSI=t gclcvs
GCL (GNU Common Lisp)  2.7.0 ANSI    Jan 26 2007 00:48:46
Source License: LGPL(gcl,gmp,pargcl), GPL(unexec,bfd,xgcl)
Binary License:  GPL due to GPL'ed components: (XGCL READLINE BFD UNEXEC)
Modifications of this banner must retain notice of a compatible license
Dedicated to the memory of W. Schelter

Use (help) to get some basic information on how to use GCL.

Temporary directory for compiler files set to /tmp/

>(find-symbol "WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX")

WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX
:INTERNAL

>(fboundp (find-symbol "WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX"))

T

>(symbol-function (find-symbol "WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX"))

(MACRO . #<compiled-function WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX>)

>

Please let me know if problems persist.

Take care,
-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah
=============================================================================
sorry, yes I do mean WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX.


On 2/18/07, Paul F. Dietz <address@hidden> wrote:

Do you mean WITH-STANDARD-IO-SYNTAX?


WITH-STANDARD-IO is not in the standard.


    Pail


Jeff wrote:


> Hi,
>
> I recently started using gcl to learn common lisp, but ran into a
> problem or two.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, with-standard-io does not appear to be in the
> 2.6.7 release, I get the message "Error: The function WITH-STANDARD-IO
> is undefined".
>
> I initially tried the latest cvs, but that wouldn't build, so I
> checked out a slightly older one, using cvs's -D option, plucked a
> date out of the air, 20070101.
>
> This built ok, and with-standard-io works, but defpackage appears to
> be undefined.
>
> I've grown quite fond of gcl, despite these recent difficulties, could
> perhaps one of the maintainers advise on the status of these things
> (assuming I haven't got this all wrong).
>
> Thank you
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
=============================================================================