Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing

[Matt Kaufmann]

I believe that ACL2 is GPLv2 in that same sense (except we do
occasionally put up CCL images as well).

-- Matt
   X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
   From: Raymond Toy <address@hidden>
   Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 06:28:10 -0500
   X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: user-0c99ag2.cable.mindspring.com
   X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
   Cc: Donald Winiecki <address@hidden>, address@hidden
   Sender: address@hidden
   X-SpamAssassin-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0
   X-UTCS-Spam-Status: No, hits=-124 required=165

   On 11/5/10 9:52 AM, Camm Maguire wrote:
   > Greetings, and thanks so much for this!
   > 
   > I've been asked to query -- are there any GPLv2 only projects using
   > GCL?  If so, please now so state.

   I think maxima is GPLv2 only.  GCL isn't the only Lisp that can be used
   with maxima, but it has historically been the main lisp used to create
   binaries.

   Ray


   _______________________________________________
   Gcl-devel mailing list
   address@hidden
   http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel