Re: [Gluster-devel] Async replication

[phil cryer]

I'm testing with lscynd now to sync remote clusters (ours running
gluster, others may be, may not be) and it's working well.  Also look
at http://code.google.com/p/pylsyncd/ which boasts:

"The main advantage of pylsyncd against lsyncd is that it uses message
queues in order to synchronize in a parallel way several destination
servers, saving up time when it is required to have more than one
destination. It has been tested in heavy loaded environments."

P

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Gordan Bobic <address@hidden> wrote:
> anthony garnier wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I'd like to know if gluster developpers intend to develop a module option
>> for Asynchronous  replication ?
>>
>> Let me know if you got some informations.
>
> I think you may be trying to use the wrong tool for the job here. If you
>  really want asynchronous replication (no concurrent access arbitration,
> locking, and other things that wouldn't work asynchronously), then perhaps
> lsyncd (http://code.google.com/p/lsyncd/) would be a better tool for the job
> (make sure you use the svn trunk version, it has a number of important bug
> fixes in it).
>
> GlusterFS is a great _cluster_ file system with rather unique benefits, but
> if you really want to play _that_ fast and loose, and throw away the
> consistency-ensuring constraints (and since you want async replication, it
> sounds like you do), you can cut a few more corners to gain a lot of extra
> performance. Just make sure you are aware of the limitations and
> consequences of this - concurrent file writes _will_ lead to race conditions
> which will trash your data.
>
> Gordan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
http://philcryer.com