|
From: | Johan Andersson |
Subject: | Re: [gNewSense-users] Request For Packaging: IceCat web browser |
Date: | Fri, 15 Mar 2019 23:36:54 -0700 |
From: Narcis Garcia address@hidden Sent: 10/8/2017 8:21:09 AM To: address@hidden Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] Request For Packaging: IceCat web browser In the meanwhile, Iceweasel/Firefox is not a better option than Icecat. One reason to IceCat lacks of developers/contributors is the lack of distribution to users. El 09/08/17 a les 22:42, Sam Geeraerts ha escrit: > Op Wed, 9 Aug 2017 09:55:42 +0200 > schreef Narcis Garcia <address@hidden>: > >> Here is the information concerning to this proposal: >> https://bugs.debian.org/637348 >> >> GuixSD, Parabola and Trisquel already include IceCat in their >> repositories. > > It makes a lot of sense for a free distro to include IceCat. And I must > admit that our Iceweasel is not in the state I would like it to be. But > I unsubscribed from Gnuzilla's mailing list a few months ago because I > got really tired of all the complaints, demands and rants without much > constructive contributions coming in. I think a discussion about what > we want a browser for a free distro to look like is needed and it's > also a continuous evaluation, but the IceCat community does/did not > seem to be welcoming to that. > > So I'm currently not looking at IceCat. I might check it out again in > some time, hopefully getting a more positive impression then. > > _______________________________________________ > gNewSense-users mailing list > address@hidden > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users > _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users . |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |