Re: Segfault with smsd

[Pawel Kot]

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 16:39, Daniele Forsi<address@hidden> wrote:
> 2009/8/28 Pawel Kot:
>
>> But I wonder why data->raw_sms->number can be 0 here. It should not.
>
> the OP was using smsd 0.6.27 which tried to read location 0 when
> autodetecting the first SMS location, reverted in commit
> 3c81f0fe82323331267d9c1bfc8339953e8f5f22

Good point. 0th location was only for AT driver as far as I remember.

>> I wonder also if the function in the middle do not have side effect of
>> altering data->raw_sms->number.
>
> I haven't checked that, my fix would not catch it

I know :)

take care,
-- 
Pawel Kot