[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] The future of patient care computing?
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] The future of patient care computing? |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jul 2012 19:35:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:10:37PM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:
> If GNUmed were deployed under a master-slave
> configuration, could one of the slaves be made available
> read-only?
Sure, no problem.
> Would it be reasonable to allow a patient to view
> (read-only) the information
Yes, certainly.
> using a defined subset of plugins,
I would advise against having the patient use the same
client as the provider, thusly, I advise against the idea,
though technically it is not impossible.
> in a way that
>
> - required them to provide sufficient identifiers (for example, a date of
> birth together with a health number) to uniquely match themselves and
> - to access an instance of GNUmed which is 'locked" to that record
Such "locked" always bears the risk of "not locked enough"
which is why I would recommend to
- use a *different* client with other capabilities to begin with
- NOT connect to the live database of the praxis but rather
to an on-demand, this-patient-only copy (export) of that
This is also because there will be data which will carry a
need to be withheld from the patient.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346