gnustandards standards.texi

[Richard M. Stallman]

CVSROOT:        /sources/gnustandards
Module name:    gnustandards
Changes by:     Richard M. Stallman <rms>       21/08/17 09:21:06

Modified files:
        .              : standards.texi 

Log message:
        (References): nonfree -> non-free, for uniformity.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnustandards/standards.texi?cvsroot=gnustandards&r1=1.271&r2=1.272

Patches:
Index: standards.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/gnustandards/gnustandards/standards.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.271
retrieving revision 1.272
diff -u -b -r1.271 -r1.272
--- standards.texi      17 Aug 2021 13:19:55 -0000      1.271
+++ standards.texi      17 Aug 2021 13:21:06 -0000      1.272
@@ -4608,21 +4608,21 @@
 A web page recommends a program in an implicit but particularly strong
 way if it requires users to run that program in order to use the page.
 Many pages contain Javascript code which they recommend in this way.
-This Javascript code may be free or nonfree, but nonfree is the usual
+This Javascript code may be free or non-free, but non-free is the usual
 case.
 
 If the purpose for which you would refer to the page cannot be carried
-out without running nonfree Javascript code, then you should not refer
+out without running non-free Javascript code, then you should not refer
 to it.  Thus, if the purpose of referring to the page is for people to
 view a video, or subscribing to a mailing list, and the viewing or
-subscribing fail to work if the user's browser blocks the nonfree
+subscribing fail to work if the user's browser blocks the non-free
 Javascript code, then don't refer to that page.
 
-The extreme case is that of web sites which depend on nonfree
+The extreme case is that of web sites which depend on non-free
 Javascript code even to @emph{see} the contents of the pages.  Any
 site hosted on @indicateurl{wix.com} has this problem, and so do some
 other sites.  Referring people to such pages to read their contents
-is, in effect, urging them to run those nonfree programs---so please
+is, in effect, urging them to run those non-free programs---so please
 don't refer to those pages.  (Such pages also break the Web, so they
 deserve condemnation for two reasons.)